Home Actualité internationale CM – Baseline Policies: A $ 400 Million Newsom Recall Election?
Actualité internationale

CM – Baseline Policies: A $ 400 Million Newsom Recall Election?

A nationwide special election this fall, in which voters could remove Gavin Newsom from office, could cost $ 400 million, according to election officials.

This is the April 26, 2021 edition of the Essential Politics newsletter. Do you like what you read? Sign up three times a week to get it to your inbox.

Given the signs of a special election this fall that could see voters remove Governor Gavin Newsom from office, local officials across California believe that the cost of holding the elections could be as high as $ 400 million.

The estimate is four to five times higher than estimates made over the past few months and is about $ 18 per registered voter – more than twice what local electoral officials spent on California elections in 2018.

It is an award dated by districts struggling to meet pandemic-related health and health program costs State coverage.

« This is urgent, » said Donna Johnston, Sutter County voter registrar and president of the California Assn. of employees and elected officials.

Johnston’s group based its estimate of $ 400 million on a preliminary cost statement from the November 2020 election, for which a ballot was sent to each registered voter and which were strictly regulated in person to vote minimize the risk of coronavirus infections.

The recall elections will be conducted in a similar manner. State officials have already expanded the sending of ballot papers to all voters for special elections in 2021.

With spending reported by 33 of California’s 58 counties, the Employees’ Association’s balance sheet for last November was $ 292 million. The final numbers could make it the most expensive choice in state history. It was also an election subsidized by the federal coronavirus relief funds. In some small counties, the money covered most of the election costs.

A neglected provision in a 2017 California law that revised the rules for recall voting seems to suggest that the state will take the tab for « reasonably necessary » costs, but also states that there are funds that are « intended for this purpose. »

A Newsom spokesman declined to say whether the governor would support putting money in the new state budget for a recall election. Governor’s campaign spokesman Dan Newman said Californians would rather spend the money helping schools and small businesses affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The leaders of the two legislatures that are around Support for the state, which bears the cost of the election, was instead criticized by supporters of the recall.

« Neither the state nor the counties should take account of such unnecessary elections, » said assembly spokesman Anthony Rendon (D -Lakewood).

« This is a very expensive partisan Republican ploy, and as usual, taxpayers leave their pockets in their hands as you see it, » Senate President Toni Atkins (D-San Diego) said in an E -Mail to The Times.

Randy Economy, a spokesperson for Newsom’s recall campaign, said some costs – particularly the requirement to send a ballot to every registered voter – could have been avoided if the Be offices would have allowed a “traditional” election. He said the governor is the one who bears responsibility through his actions.

« You can’t put a price on democracy, » said the business community. « The only reason we’re in this position is Gavin Newsom. »

The looming question of who will pay to carry out the recall is a stark reminder of how the California elections have been chronically underfunded for years are.

« While the state regularly benefits from the administration of state elections, it only sporadically provides the counties with funds for electoral activities, » wrote the independent Legislative Analyst’s Office in a report from 2017.

In The report valued total county debt for previous electoral mandates at that time at $ 71 million and announced that without legislative action it would grow by about $ 30 million each general election year. Johnston, president of the white-collar workers association, said some estimates put the IOU for the state election now at $ 160 million. Voters may not see the possible consequences. In a 2017 column, I noted that California law allows counties to simply stop offering some of these voting services if the state doesn’t spit out enough money: « You could refuse to send postal ballot papers to anyone who wants one To make available. Or perhaps more provocatively in the current climate of electoral integrity, they might refuse to apply longstanding legal rules when asked to verify a voter’s signature on a preliminary ballot. No money, no mandate services. “

With the new electoral rules coming into effect, the districts will continue to advocate that the state pays its fair share. A new law that allowed voter registration up to and including election day did not bring clear funding for locals – a decision that was challenged by San Diego County in December.

One thing we know for sure is that the state has the money. There are already estimates for a massive tax break and discretionary revenue in the state budget totaling 20 billion US dollars by the summer of 2022.

« The best way for the state to show the counties some love is to give them the money said Kim Alexander, president of the bipartisan California Voter Foundation.

In a surprise for local election officials and political observers, last week ended with a report from Secretary of State Shirley Weber on the number of signatures for recall requests by the counties by April 19. An announcement could be made as early as Monday.

The Weber office is responsible for collecting these reports from the counties and, if necessary, conducting a final review to ensure the numbers add up.

A spokesman for the Secretary did not respond to inquiries at the time of the report on Friday. Based on the number of electoral signatures validated last month and preliminary reports from some counties, the record is likely to confirm what even Newsom has already admitted: He will face a recall election later this year.

The counties must all Complete reviews of recall requests by Thursday. As soon as Weber informs election officials of the results, the watch will begin a series of other preparations for recall elections.

The California governor’s recall in 2003 drew several celebrities. So it may come as no surprise that the 2021 edition will reflect a mix of politics and Hollywood, provided by Caitlyn Jenner.

Last week, the reality TV star and former Olympic gold medalist announced her intention to do so participate in the recall election to serve for the remainder of Newsom’s term in office should voters oust him.

« I am a proven winner and the only underdog who can end Gavin Newsom’s disastrous governor, » wrote 71-year-old Republican Jenner on Twitter.

The appearance of Jenner, her mix of activism on transgender issues and one-time support for former President Donald Trump, made headlines across the country. Newsom’s political team sent out several donation emails in the hours following the news broadcast. On Saturday, the campaign warned donors that Jenner is part of GOP efforts to « bring a Trump acolyte to power » in California.

Some experts compared Jenner’s candidacy to that of Arnold Schwarzenegger, who is running the election of 2003, when voters remembered Governor Gray Davis, won with ease. But for those of us who have covered this election, the comparison has its limits. Most notably, Schwarzenegger had thought long and hard about a run for the governor – one he had pioneered by successfully campaigning for a 2002 statewide election that provided funding for after-school programs.

On the campaign trail, Schwarzenegger certainly used his iconic image to draw attention to his reputable campaign platform. He eventually won the support of California Republican leaders and cemented his support within the GOP base. « What credentials are there? » Don Sipple, a political advisor who produced advertising for Schwarzenegger’s 2003 campaign, said of Jenner. « What is the foundation laid in public policy to indicate that she would be a plausible candidate or governor? »

The early hours of Jenner’s candidacy were tumultuous. Her decision was quickly criticized by one of the largest LGBTQ rights groups in California and by trans activists across the country. And in a tweet posted on Saturday, she suggested that California prosecutors either be selected or respond to Newsom – neither scenario is true, however.

– As his presidency hits its 100th day this week, it’s clear that President Biden has decided to rule as progressive on the question of the government’s role in society, clearly to the left of his three democratic predecessors.

– On Saturday, Biden officially recognized the murder of more than 1 million Armenians from 1915 onwards as genocide. This label has long been used by historians but was rejected by US presidents in order not to anger Turkey, a key ally.

– Months after former Trump’s electoral defeat, Arizona Republicans are questioning the result, as they make unprecedented efforts to validate the results.

– Newsom took action on Friday to ban new hydraulic fracture permits from 2024. This is a reversal of previous statements that lacked executive power.

– Legislators confirmed Democratic MP Rob Bonta as California attorney general on Thursday. He told his former colleagues that he would hold law enforcement accountable for excessive violence and other misconduct.

– A federal appeals court ruled Friday that criminal defendants were not deprived of their right to speedy trial or unconstitutionally forced to stay behind bars stay because the COVID-19 pandemic delayed their legal proceedings.

– Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti’s spending plan for fiscal year 2021-22 includes a slight increase for the LAPD. This disappoints proponents who want to use these funds for social services.

Stay up to date with the latest news on our politics page. And follow us on Twitter @latimespolitics? Has anyone forwarded this to you? Sign up here to get Essential Politics in your inbox. Until next time, send your comments, suggestions, and news tips to [email protected].

John Myers joined the Los Angeles Times in 2015 as head of the Sacramento office and has spent more than two decades deal with politics, government and elections in California.

Climate & Environment

EPA to restore California’s power over auto emissions regulations to overturn Trump

Climate & Environment

EPA to restore California’s power over auto emissions regulations to overturn Trump

The action is a great win for California’s fight against climate change. It could also put pressure on automakers to accept stricter national car pollution regulations.

politics

The Supreme Court won’t hear Texas challenging California law that bans government-funded travel there

politics

The Supreme Court won’t hear Texas challenging California law that bans government-funded travel there

The Supreme Court refused to enter into a battle between Texas and California over Texas state laws that discriminate against LGBTQ people.

politics

The Supreme Court agrees to determine whether gun owners have the right to carry a gun in public

politics

The Supreme Court agrees to determine whether gun owners have the right to carry a gun in public

The Supreme Court ruling could have a major impact in California as, like New York, it severely restricts who can be concealed.

California

Column: The California GOP could benefit – win or lose – from a Newsom recall election if they play their cards right

California

Column: The California GOP could benefit – win or lose – from a Newsom recall election if they play their cards right

The GOP has a unique opportunity to get its message across to voters in a recall election, writes columnist George Skelton.

Dodgers

Don’t say it, Vin: Farmer John Dodger’s dogs are no more

Dodgers

Don’t say it, Vin: Farmer John Dodger’s dogs are no more

You can still get a Dodger dog at Dodger Stadium, but it won’t come from Farmer John, who didn’t renew his contract with the club after the 2019 season.

Dodgers

Plaschke: Dodgers are betrayed again, this time by the theft of Fernando Tatis Jr.

Dodgers

Plaschke: Dodgers are betrayed again, this time by the theft of Fernando Tatis Jr.

Fernando Tatis Jr. dominated the Dodgers during their four-game streak, and Trevor Bauer is not happy about the Padres star’s alleged theft of signs.

Sports

NFL mock draft live: Beat reporters make their first choice

Sports

NFL mock draft live: Beat reporters make their first choice

Reporters who cover their teams on a daily basis predict how the first round of the 2021 NFL draft in the Times Beatwriters’ mock draft will play out.

Climate & Environment

Wells dry up, crops endangered, farm workers pending as drought hits the San Joaquin Valley in California

Climate & Environment

Wells dry up, crops endangered, farm workers pending as drought hits the San Joaquin Valley in California

As the San Joaquin Valley prepares for another drought, some growers are openly questioning the future of agriculture here.

California

Months before George Floyd’s death, Angel Zapata Hernandez died in San Diego with a knee on his neck

California

Months before George Floyd’s death, Angel Zapata Hernandez died in San Diego with a knee on his neck

Aside from a vague press release from the San Diego Police Department following the death of Angel Zapata Hernandez, few people knew the circumstances surrounding his death.

Ref: https://www.latimes.com

A LIRE AUSSI ...

Le Cameroun confie la gestion de son service de visa électronique à une société ivoirienne

Le ministère des Relations extérieures du Cameroun a récemment annoncé qu’une société...

États-Unis : BNP Paribas poursuivi pour « complicité de génocide » au Soudan

Une décision de justice américaine a contraint le géant bancaire français BNP...

Tensions à l’ONU où le Maroc et l’Algérie s’affrontent sur le Sahara

Abdelmadjid Tebboune et Mohammed VI Le Conseil de sécurité de l’ONU a...

[quads id=1]