Britney Spears attorney Mathew Rosengart said in Los Angeles Superior Court Monday that « the chickens really did come home to sleep » after the New York Times published a « bomb reveal. » which revealed that Jamie, 69, allegedly secretly hired security guards to record his 39-year-old pop star daughter without her permission.
In a court record obtained from Page Six, Rosengart highlighted how the report revealed how Jamie allegedly did « Has committed appalling and unscrupulous intrusions into the privacy of his adult daughter. » Spears] Communications « and apparently also the communication between attorney and client with their former attorney, which are an inviolable part of the legal system, » said the senior attorney.
Rosengart also noted in court records that « was even more shocking » How Jamie and « his cohorts » allegedly « secretly recorded audio recordings of Britney’s bedroom, including private communications with their children ».
« Unauthorized recording or surveillance of Britney’s private communications … constitutes an unscrupulous and nefarious violation of her privacy rights and a striking example of the loss of their civil liberties, « said Rosengart in a statement to Page Six on Monday.
He added: » Placing a bugging device in Britney’s bedroom would be particularly appalling and confirm so much of her convincing , poignant testimony. Mr. Spears has crossed unfathomable limits. ”
The filing also indicated that California – where Britney lives and the jurisdiction where she has a conservatory – is a“ two-party ”consent state, meaning that both the admitting party as well as the admitting party are required to submit authorization to the law.
Rosengart said in court documents that « as a result of these deeply disturbing allegations, Mr. Spears will inevitably look to them for the next few days and weeks focus on defending his own interests, not his daughter’s (again). September as a restorer will be removed when the next hearing on the case is to take place.
Last week, Rosengart filed a petition stating, i as Jamie should be removed because he could « obstruct » his daughter’s marriage contract with fiancé Sam Asghari – apart from the fact that Jamie also has a bad financial history including bankruptcy, and like Britney’s mother, Lynne Spears and the temporary one Restorer Jodi Montgomery agree that Jamie must be removed.
However, Rosengart has repeatedly said that Jamie’s removal would not preclude him from further investigations into alleged criminal activity that could have occurred throughout the Conservatory period.
The attorney said on Monday filing: « Even assuming that Mr. Spears would rely on the fifth amendment in his testimony, there are still questions he would need to answer that affect the court’s rulings on these accounting and financial statements Financial issues would affect an evidence hearing. « In the future. »He added, « In this one In context, simply invoking the Fifth Amendment would be very instructive and would also enable the court or jury to reach an adverse conclusion based on that appeal. «
Edan Yemini, Britney Security chief, also responded did not respond immediately to Page Six’s request for comment.
In August, Jamie said he would agree to step down from the Conservatory « when the time is right. » A restorer would be in her best interests. ”
He has publicly stated that he always had the“ best interests ”of his daughter in mind when making decisions about the Conservatory group.
© 2021 NYP Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved
Terms of Use
Data protection
Your ad choices
Page index
Your California Privacy Rights
Don’t sell my personal information
Keywords:
