CM – Exclusive: National Cabinet said the hospital crisis could last six months


National Cabinet has been informed of new data that represents a dramatic shift from managing a short-term « catastrophe » that is overwhelming ICUs, as is soon forecast in New South Wales, to one in which serious pressure on hospital networks continues « for a long time ».

Although the first modeling was built around a crisis month, the load on the system will take more than half a year. What this means for an already exhausted hospital workforce remains to be seen.

The briefing presented to the national cabinet on Friday represents a realization that a longer term shock to the health system is now the most likely outcome of the national plan, the lockdowns gradually ending while pursuing vaccination goals for 70 and 80 percent of the adult population.

While it is not yet clear how long hospital systems can withstand constant, increased pressure, the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) has polled for more than 180 critical care directors and nursing units to estimate the capacity for a marathon of a sprint instead.

The Saturday Paper assumes that these projections are « more realistic » than the « optimistic » numbers that were made during the pandemic planning last year were deployed precisely because they have a n Need to be stretched for a long period of time. Under these agreements, bottlenecks outside of the intensive care units will become more frequent and spread to the rest of the hospital system.

Non-urgent elective surgeries in the greater Sydney area have been suspended since the end of July. At the end of August, some large private hospitals were restricted to performing « Category 1 » procedures as 600 private hospital staff were transferred to the public sector and certain public patients were sent to private facilities.

In Victoria, these operations have been going on since the middle Performed occasionally last year, with all but the most urgent surgeries reinstated to the public system on August 23rd, are subject to a « risk assessment » and tend to fluctuate with the threat of the virus, include hip and knee replacements, cataract surgeries, Colonoscopies and even finger amputation.

The Victorian Agency for Health Information notes these effects, saying, “The limits introduced in response to the Covid-19 pandemic have significant and lasting effects on volume, type and size the timing of elective surgery in hospitals. « 

In southwest Sydney, a source from Campbelltown Hospital told The Saturday Paper, » There are four full-fledged Covid wards that were once surgical wards « . This is just the beginning of these changes, it says: « There are plans for two more wards. »

Essentially, the need to redirect resources to the management of Covid-19 patients leads to problems elsewhere in the health network – which will last for months and lead to a possibly impaired supply.

One day before the revised capacity data was presented to the national cabinet, NSW Prime Minister Gladys Berejiklian announced the state government’s plan to gradually introduce “Freedoms “Grant for fully vaccinated residents.

At the national level, and particularly in NSW and Victoria, where Delta variant outbreaks have outperformed efforts at full control, there is a two-speed debate on short-term disaster management and longer-term sustainability issues .

On Monday, Berejiklian published projections for the hospital’s capacity aussystems in the coming months with peak demand of 947 beds in the intensive care unit at the beginning of November. The model suggested that 560 of these would be used by Covid-19 patients. Overall, the modeling, which was carried out by the Burnet Institute and supplemented by data from the state government’s health system, estimates the number of people in hospitals with and without Covid at 3434.

However, this modeling assumes that all current restrictions in NSW would persist. It doesn’t take into account the ongoing issues and how Thursday’s Berejiklian announcement will affect them.

The prime minister previously said there are around 400 non-Covid patients in the state’s intensive care units at any given time. The modeling allows a peak value of 387. But on September 2, for example, there were 519 patients in NSW intensive care beds who did not have Covid-19, according to the real-time monitoring platform nicknamed CHRIS.

The Critical Health Resource Information System was developed last year to aid decision-making for heads of state – and federal leaders and has been used to routinely update the national cabinet on the situation in the Australian intensive care units. On the same day in early September, the Burnet model predicts a total of around 515 patients with and without Covid. The actual number that day was 689. Late Wednesday, Victoria released its own forecast for hospital demand, with numbers detailing the state will reach 18,000 cases by mid-October, of which 800 would be hospitalized . According to the CHRIS platform on Thursday morning, there were 31 patients with Covid-19 in Victoria’s intensive care units.

Although officials say the state may ramp up to a similar number of emergency intensive care beds as NSW – around 1,500 – means this number is an increase of more than four times the normal number of establishments. In NSW, reaching this overvoltage capacity is a little less than
a doubling of the usual intensive care beds.

Plans have already been drawn up for a worst-case scenario in the health network. In NSW, doctors and nurses have been told by hospital managers that life-saving assistance may not be provided or may even be discontinued for those with an average age of 72 during the « overwhelming » phase of the current Delta outbreak. Expected in late October and early November.

NSW Health’s protocol for triage of critical care resources, updated in July for this wave of infections, states that « complex ethical and clinical management problems can arise during a pandemic, especially when healthcare demand outgrows supply. » The guideline states: “At some point it may be necessary to prioritize limited intensive care resources to those who need treatment and who are most likely to survive.

Consider the availability of limited critical care resources. ”

This protocol, which will be consistently activated throughout the state, is based on a 2010 policy document detailing the precautions for a pandemic influenza.

While for As these outbreak guidelines and other guidance documents are drawn up, the ability to find staff to help achieve these goals is still in question. still talks ”with the NSW Department of Health“ to understand where they are in relation to them ”.
of their plan ”.

“ We’re still looking for more details, ”he says. “I think more details will be developed. If the prime minister says everything is planned, well, there is a plan. It’s a piece of paper. Then it’s about operationalizing the plan, and they certainly haven’t fully operationalized that. ”

The challenge, he says, is that the healthcare workforce has to come from somewhere. For example, there are currently more than 2,000 registered nurses working in NSW Health’s vaccination centers.

« So they have to recruit new staff to get some of those nurses out, » says Holmes. « You can’t release all of them, of course, because they cast undergraduate health students into the roles of vaccinees and they still need some level of supervision. » is similar, but not the same – but as many as possible are still needed.

« The important thing is that for the rest of the hospital you still have to replenish people who are brought out of other intensive care areas or ward areas, » says Holmes.

NSW Health has not disclosed in any of its plans or guidelines how high patient care rates are expected to be under the surge regulations, although the original Covid-19 pandemic influenza plan, as amended, made it clear that “the existing ones are expected Personnel quotas “while peak demand is not sustained”.

The Saturday Paper g e assumes that some patients in the intensive care unit have already diluted their 1: 1 supply ratios to 1: 2, although the escalation model is likely to maintain the physical ratios as much as possible by using less skilled health workers.

Im Under normal conditions, ventilated intensive care patients or patients with complex nursing needs are cared for by a single intensive care nurse who works under medical supervision. According to an NSW Health policy updated in late June, in the second phase of the emergency plan, these nurses would oversee two additional critical care workers who would come from other hospital functions such as anesthesia, emergency, operating rooms, convalescence, and coronary care units.

In the third and final units During this phase of the increase plan triggered by « extreme compromises and overwhelming effects with exhausted local workforce, » these nurses could be a combination of ICU and ICU staff who will oversee four other nurses from anywhere in the system.

In that context A “general hospital intensive care advisor” will “work with other specialists to support intensive care triage and decision-making regarding resuscitation and treatment goals” he verbally informed the intensive care unit of the exclusion criteria for finding scarce resources.

An ICU doctor who spoke to The Saturday Paper on condition of anonymity said these protocols were not new and have been used in all health systems around the world .

« The difference, especially for an advanced system like us in NSW, is the frequency with which such decisions may have to be made and the potential for fairly blunt, quick decisions in these life or death discussions », they said.

« Now you can argue that we in NSW may have done more to prepare, and I think that’s true. You can argue that we should have done more to quell this outbreak, but there is less evidence for that. All you have to do is look at Victoria to see how this variation confuses our best efforts.

« There is no doubt that we would not have been forced to make so many, or perhaps no, decisions about who to save should if we vaccinated more people faster. It’s just a fact.

“But we can still change shape. Please get vaccinated. At this point we are begging. ”

The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society issued a separate policy on“ Complex Healthcare Decisions ”for members last year, stating that“ the need to make difficult decisions, cannot be avoided « .

Such considerations should first be clinically assessed by patients, including » the likelihood of long-term patient survival in an attempt to assess both the quality and potential quantity of that life « .

It can however, a time will come when the clinical risk will be similar for a number of patients all in need of care, the guideline says. In these circumstances, clinicians might consider “promoting that younger patients who have lived through fewer life stages should prioritize older patients.” Most triage protocols use some form of matrix, which is a scale used to measure organ failure , Age and other comorbidities or, in the language most commonly used in health updates in Australia, « underlying diseases ».

An August study conducted by Dr. Jai Darvall, headed by the intensive care unit at Royal Melbourne Hospital, notes that current pandemic triage protocols in the intensive care unit use scores such as « exclude patients with hospital survival rates close to 80 percent and over 30 percent five-year survival » .

In other words, the triage protocol stipulates that people who otherwise have an 8 in 10 chance of survival will be denied care.

“In these groups, short stays in admissions associated with mortality were observed which suggests that such a low priority strategy will not achieve a large reduction in ‘wasted’ ICU bed days for patients who would ultimately die, « the paper, published in the scientific journal Chest, says.

“Finally, our results imply that a more complex assessment of candidates for inclusion is based on the intensive care unit, which could include a risk assessment based on a combination of frailty, age, comorbidities, organ dysfunction and admission diagnosis, is required to make triage decisions. Nhi Nguyen, who was one of the high-level community of practice working groups developing contingency plans for the NSW government, told reporters Monday that the entire state is being treated as a single intensive care unit.

The transfer of patients Moving from one hospital to another is a sign that the system is working, she said.

« So, over the past week, we received a signal that the number was going to increase, » she said. “Does that worry us as an intensive care unit? Of course it does. Is it the biggest challenge we will face as a health system and will we get into a crisis? I’m very confident that we have plans.

« We know there are nurses and medical staff who are a little uncomfortable with what they’re being asked, but I’m really confident that we can have such a well-connected and supportive environment that patients continue to be cared for « when they need it. »

But there was a glaring gap in the modeling published this week by the NSW government and on which they are Predictions are based. There is not a single mention of paramedics.

As a source tells The Saturday Paper, crews and vehicles have to come from somewhere and one of the « key demand management strategies » in all but the final stage of contingency planning is that to transfer seriously ill patients over the network. This is only possible through the ambulance service.

While Nguyen says that this is a sign that the system is working, the beispi have A large number of hospitalized and critically ill patients combined with the overwhelming number of infections in a relatively small geographic area made this surgical method more stressful than ever in the history of the state – Discontinue weekly contracts to meet staffing needs, but there are no new ambulances. They are a finite state resource.

Last Friday evening, more than 60 ambulance jobs waited for a response from ambulance crews in southwest Sydney alone. On Monday morning, a crew waited 11 hours for a single job. On Tuesday night, in an emergency, a patient waited 90 minutes for a response from the NSW Ambulance.

Again, there are less obvious implications. A source in a maternity ward at a Sydney hospital said pregnant women with Covid-19 must be taken to and from the hospital by ambulance. It’s a state policy. Some are stuck in a ward for up to two days after an official discharge because the system for the journey home is not relaxed.

« Partners are also usually positive and cannot leave the house due to isolation requirements, » said the source.

As the national cabinet turns its attention to managing hospital capacity in a semi-open, largely vaccinated world – just over two months after the transition plan was approved – there is still tension in NSW about what is needed Caution. The same tension exists in other states.

On Thursday, The Australian reported that NSW’s Chief Health Officer, Dr. Kerry Chant, in the state government’s crisis cabinet, urged that NSW only reopen when 80 to 85 percent of the full vaccination rate had been reached. She was apparently talked out of it and reluctantly agreed to a goal of 70 percent double the dose on the condition that the effective reproductive value of the virus at the outbreak was below one.

« I’m really very excited about the community vaccinations she said in response. “Please don’t take any chances while we are at this time. We don’t need super-spreading events. We don’t need sowing in the regions. We just don’t need anything else as we work to reduce the number of cases and use our response based on the vaccine intake that we have seen. ”

Even after this acute disaster, the hospital system will remain critically tense – and that probably for several months or even half a year.

Much has been said so far about maintaining ICU capacity, but health workers are concerned about the compromises that will be made to keep the system in the crucial transition phase between crises and learning to keep « life » as normal as possible « with Covid-19.

 » If you postpone elective surgeries that are not currently urgent, there are still ramifications, « a doctor told The Saturday Paper . “We still need vaccination staff, the staff still needs vacation. To support the demand at the peak end, we are robbing other parts of the entire healthcare system. ”

As Nguyen said on Monday, the entire system is networked. If the burden of disease is spread across the hospitals, it is a sign that the system is working. However, it is not a system that enjoys its natural equilibrium.

The question that Australia’s leaders now have to answer is: How long can a healthcare system sustain this increased, sustained demand?

This article was first published in the print edition of The Saturday Paper on. released
09/11/2021 as « Exclusive: National Cabinet announced that the hospital crisis could last six months ».

A free press is one that you pay for. In the short term, the economic consequences of the coronavirus took up around a third of our sales. We will get through this crisis, but we need the support of the readers. Now is the time to subscribe.


Health care coverage and access,Home care,Nurse,New South Wales,Law,Health care coverage and access, Home care, Nurse, New South Wales, Law,,Hospital,,,,,,

Donnez votre avis et abonnez-vous pour plus d’infos

Vidéo du jour: