CM – Top scientists slam the WHO and insist that the COVID laboratory leak theory is « feasible ».

0
5

A group of top scientists from around the world have pushed the World Health Organization’s conclusion that it is « extremely unlikely » that COVID-19 has leaked from a Wuhan laboratory. She insists that the theory is « viable » and deserves « proper investigation. » Eighteen prominent scientists, including an epidemiologist from Harvard University and a microbiologist from Stanford University, are calling for a « transparent » and « data-driven » investigation the causes of the pandemic, which killed more than 3.34 million people worldwide on Friday.

« Theories about the accidental release from a laboratory and about zoonotic overflows remain viable, » the scientists wrote in a letter, which was published in Science magazine on Thursday.

« Knowing how COVID-19 came about is critical to educating yourself about global strategies to mitigate the risk of future outbreaks. »

The letter comes after one Joint study by WHO and Chinese officials on the origin of the virus in March, which found that humans are likely to be infected by an animal rt that the virus got from bats – while a laboratory incident was « extremely unlikely ».

However, the scientists who wrote Thursday’s letter say the prospect of a laboratory leak cannot be ruled out as the Theory was “out of balance” – with only 4 pages of the 313-page report devoted to it.

« In particular, WHO Director General Tedros Ghebreyesus noted that the report did not include evidence of a laboratory accident inadequate and provide additional resources, « the letter said, adding that » more clarity « can be achieved through additional research.

 » We have to take hypotheses about both natural and laboratory spillovers seriously until we can have sufficient data, « the letter continued.

« A proper investigation should be transparent, objective, data-driven, include broad expertise, be subject to independent oversight, and responsibly managed to minimize the impact of conflicts of interest. » Anthony Fauci, the leading U.S. infectious disease expert, admitted on Capitol Hill earlier this month the virus could have come from a Wuhan laboratory and said the possibility should be further investigated.

« That possibility exists undoubtedly, and I am fully in favor of a full investigation into whether this could have happened, « Fauci told GOP Senator Roger Marshall.

A year earlier, in May 2020, Fauci said the virus likely spread » developed in nature and then species jumped « rather than being » artificially or deliberately manipulated « .

Fauci’s comments contradicted claims made by President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who said there was » tremendous evidence « that the virus originated in a laboratory in Wuhan, where the outbreak first appeared in December 2019.

One of the scientists who signed Thursday’s letter told the Los Angeles Times that the possibility of a laboratory escape should be further considered.

« We believe this is a fair and thorough science-based question Deserves investigation and that any subsequent assessment should be made of the available data, « said Dr. David Relman, Professor of Microbiology and Immunology at Stanford University.

« We are reasonable scientists with expertise in relevant areas and we do not see any data to suggest that this must be of natural origin. »

© 2021 NYP Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved

Terms of Use

Data protection

Your ad choices

Page index

Your California Privacy Rights

Do not sell my personal information

Keywords:

Coronavirus,Wuhan,Laboratory,Coronavirus, Wuhan, Laboratory,,Coronavirus (2019-nCoV),Laboratories and Scientific Equipment,Wuhan Institute of Virology (China),Research,World Health Organization,Science (Journal),your-feed-science,Vaccination and Immunization,,,,

Donnez votre avis et abonnez-vous pour plus d’infos

[gs-fb-comments]

Vidéo du jour: