World News – GB – As voting draws to a close, battle intensifies over which ballots will count


President Trump and his allies say they intend to aggressively question how votes are counted in key states, and Democrats are rallying to meet there

With the election ending, the Trump and Biden campaigns, voting rights organizations and conservative groups are raising money and sending armies of lawyers for what could turn out to be a state-by-state, county-by-county legal battle which ballots will ultimately be counted

The deployments – involving hundreds of lawyers on both sides – go far beyond what has become normal since the contested outcome in 2000, and are the result of open efforts by President Trump and Republicans to disqualify the votes on technical details and baseless accusations of fraud following a campaign where the electoral system was severely tested by the coronavirus pandemic

In the most aggressive moves to wipe out recorded votes in modern memory, Republicans have previously sought to overturn ballots before they are counted in multiple states, which could tip the balance of the college electoral

In a first test of an effort, a Texas federal judge on Monday condemned local Republicans who wanted to force state officials to reject more than 127,000 ballots at drive-thru polling stations newly created in the Houston area The federal court ruling, which Republicans said they would appeal, came after a state court also ruled against them

In major counties of Nevada, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, Republicans are seeking, with mixed results so far, to force election council offices to give their election observers more open access so that they can they can more effectively challenge postal ballots when processed, a North Carolina Republicans seek statewide adoption

And everywhere, in a year that has seen record levels of early voting and a surge in the use of postal voting, Republicans are preparing to challenge ballots with missing signatures or stamps. unclear post

In his last days of campaign, Mr. Trump has basically admitted that he doesn’t expect to win without going to court « As soon as these elections are over, » he told reporters over the weekend, « we’re going in with our lawyers. » p>

Hanging out regularly in the polls, Mr. At that point, Trump said out loud what other Republicans preferred to say quietly, which was that his best chance at holding on to power at this point could rest on a scorched earth campaign to disqualify as many voices as possible. for his Democratic opponent, Joseph R Biden Jr

If there is a clear result on Tuesday night that presumably could not be challenged by legal action, all planning on both sides could become moot.But if there is no decisive result, the following days will likely see a multi-frontal battle escalate in various states

After months of claiming that any election result other than a victory for him should have been « rigged, » the president used his final days of campaigning to cast doubt on the very process of tally tabulation, suggesting without any proof that any vote counted after Tuesday, no matter how legal, must be suspect

Both parties expect Mr. Trump and his allies will try again to disqualify late ballots in the emerging center of legal wrestling in Pennsylvania after the state’s High Court rejected an earlier attempt and the Supreme Court refused to hear a call

The scale of the Republican effort is beyond anything longtime civil rights lawyers have said they could remember, and they, along with lawyers for the Democrats, have said they were ready to meet M Trump’s lawyers in court

« This is the most blatant and open attempt to deny voters the right to vote massively that I have ever seen, » said Dale Ho, director of the Voting Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union, which has argued several important cases in this area year

Tom Perez, the chairman of the Democratic Party, said Democrats were closely monitoring any ballots that were rejected in major transitional states, as part of a strategy to secure and reinstate as many large number possible now and seeking to force reinstatement moreover in a post-electoral dispute if the proximity of the electoral college’s count so requires

Lawyers for the Democratic Party, backed by the Texas ruling and hoping even ideologically conservative judges would deny the Republicans’ most cheeky actions, were also preparing to monitor polling stations to be on the lookout for premature closures , long and unruly queues, pro-Trump election observers

Mr. Trump comes to the fight after showing his willingness to use the levers of power to advance his personal political interests in a way few other presidents have

A wildcard for both sides is the posture the Justice Department will take in voting disputes under Attorney General William P Barr On Monday, the department announced it would send staff from the Civil Rights Division to monitor voting in ridings across the country, including in key areas like Philadelphia, Miami, Detroit and Houston This is standard operating procedure, but both sides have girded themselves for possible protocol pauses given that Mr. Barr’s own statements about the potential for fraud, which echoed Mr. From Trump

Republican efforts took to an even more aggressive level on Sunday, after Mr. Trump has made clear his intention to challenge an unfavorable outcome by focusing in particular on postal voting, which both sides believe will favor Mr. Biden

« I think it’s terrible that we can’t know the results of an election on election night, » Mr. Trump told reporters ahead of a Sunday night rally in North Carolina before saying he intended to send his lawyers

Monday evening, in an extraordinary moment which summed up the content of his presidency, Mr. Trump wrote on Twitter that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling would « allow rampant and uncontrolled cheating » and « undermine all of our legal systems » and « induce violence on the streets, » prompting a warning on the plate. -form that he was deceptive

The president has no legal authority to stop the tally on Tuesday night, and even during normal election years, states often take days, if not weeks, to complete their tally and certify the result.

« If a jurisdiction fails to count its ballots on election night due to volume, broken machines or any other reason, there is no reason to stop it under the laws of a state, « said Benjamin L Ginsberg, one of the country’s leading electoral advocates, who has been the advocate for several Republican presidential candidates « Are you just going to deny people their rights for their sport? »

Many states require ballots to arrive before election day to be counted, but several have sought to allow the counting of ballots that are postmarked on or before election day but arrive in a certain number of days after (In Pennsylvania, it’s three)

In an interview, Justin Riemer, the chief counsel for the Republican National Committee, indicated that much of the legal wrangling in the days to come will be about such late ballots, and he disputed the Democratic charges that Republicans were only looking for to eliminate valid democratic votes

« Our position is that all legally cast ballots should be counted, » he said. « If the ballot does not meet the deadline, then I guess if you consider it to be a question technical, too bad, but these ballots should not be counted « 

He said the party’s efforts this year were aimed at ensuring that the elections were held according to the law “We protect the existing safeguards that are in place and ensure that the law is enforced and ensure in the process that everyone can have confidence in the results,” he said.

Mr. Trump has spent the last few years appointing conservative justices, an effort that has affected the balance of several appeal boards that will be essential in the shifting state voting fights while giving the Supreme Court a new conservative 6-to-3 tilt

This summer, M Barr has made a series of exaggerated statements about the problems of postal voting and has opened the door to sending federal authorities to end threats of electoral fraud

In camera, the attorney general informed Mr. Trump on Progressive Developments in Minor Voter Fraud Investigations The President, the White House and his campaign then promoted the cases as evidence that postal voting was highly problematic

Over the past two weeks, however, Mr. Barr and the Justice Department have remained silent, leading to a new campaign of pressure from conservative groups to help M Trump’s efforts to stop counting all mail-in ballots that arrive after election day

« DOJ should be prepared to go to court on this – it’s election day, not election week or month, » said Tom Fitton, head of the conservative group Judicial Watch

Mr Fitton, who said his group had more lawyers and investigators dedicated to reviewing this election than any other, said Mr Barr had to be prepared to use his legal power – including the FBje – to ensure that states kept ballots that arrived before election day separate from those that arrived after

Both parties have agreed that some of the most significant post-election legal wrangling is likely to take place in Pennsylvania, where uncertainty surrounds the state’s plan to count ballots that are postmarked on Election Day but arrive in the next three days Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed Pennsylvania to keep the plan intact, although some justices have opened the door to re-examining the matter if necessary, and Republicans have indicated they could return to the front. the tribunal

This situation has led Josh Shapiro, Pennsylvania Attorney General and Democrat, to issue guidelines that election officials should separate all ballots that arrive after 8 p.m.Tuesday

« We have taken the prudent decision to separate these ballots in part to avoid possible future legal challenges from Donald Trump and his facilitators, » Mr. Shapiro said

Some lawyers also believe it is possible that the unclear postmarks were until 2020 what the “dimpled chads” were in the 2000 recount in Florida (The term denoted unclear preferences over state ballots)

« I see this is the main area where there could be disputes between the two parties, » said M Riemer, the Republican Party lawyer « There is some ambiguity, particularly in Pennsylvania, about how you treat a ballot that arrives after Election Day but has no indication that ‘it bears the postmark on election day « 

Mr Shapiro said his team had prepared for varying levels of challenges from lawyers and Trump-aligned groups

« They will be spread out across Pennsylvania on election day and prepared for any challenges that may arise from 8:01 a.m. when the polls are closed, » he said.

The Trump campaign and Republicans also sought better access to election commissions that counted ballots, as they did in Clark County, Nevada, in a lawsuit that reportedly slowed the counting there The Democrats equated this trial with harassment

« There is no evidence that a vote that should legally be counted has or will not be counted, » Justice Wilson wrote « There is no evidence that a vote that should not legally be counted has been or will be counted »

Donald Trump, US Presidential Election, 2020 poll

News from around the world – GB – As the vote draws to a close, the battle intensifies over which ballots will count


Donnez votre avis et abonnez-vous pour plus d’infos


Vidéo du jour: