In the Supreme Court argument on Tuesday, Chief Justice Roberts and Judge Kavanaugh suggested that removing one provision would not eliminate the balance of law.
WASHINGTON – The bulk of the Affordable Care Act, the sprawling Health Care Act of 2010 that represents President Barack Obama’s defining domestic legacy, appears to have survived his recent confrontation with the Supreme Court in arguments Tuesday
It was unclear if the court would abolish the so-called single state, which became toothless in 2017 after Congress passed a zero penalty for failure to obtain insurance.
But at least five judges, including two members of the conservative majority of the court, indicated that they did not tend to disturb the balance of the law from a legal standpoint, said that the mandate was separate from the rest of the law
“It seems fairly clear that the appropriate remedy is to separate the mandate requirement and leave the rest of the law in effect,” Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh
Chief Justice John J. Roberts Jr. made a similar point and said, « Congress left the rest of the law as it was when it reduced the penalty to zero. »
Tens of millions of Americans got insurance coverage under the 2010 Act, which includes common provisions regarding guaranteed coverage for pre-existing medical conditions, emergency care, prescription drugs, and maternity care Republican state officials, backed by the Trump administration, say one of the key provisions is In law, it is unconstitutional, and this means that the entire law must fall
The law had survived two previous challenges in the Supreme Court. In 2012, the court upheld the law’s requirement that most Americans get insurance or pay a fine – “the individual mandate had the vote from 5 to 4,” Chief Justice Roberts wrote the controlling opinion, which said that The mandate is delegated by the authority of Congress to assess taxes and joined by what was at the time the liberal wing of the court made up of four members
In 2015, the court said the federal government could provide tax subsidies nationwide to help the poor and middle class buy health insurance, rejecting the argument that the subsidy is only available in states that have created markets, known as stock exchanges, to allow people who lack access to Insurance by shopping for individual health plans A different ruling would have caused havoc in insurance markets and undermined the law The vote was 6 to 3, with the four Liberals, Chief Justice and Judge Anthony M Kennedy, who retired in 2018, in the majority
Since the last major challenge, three new judges have joined the court, all appointed by President Trump. One of them, Judge Amy Connie Barrett, has publicly criticized previous rulings
In a 2017 law review article, I questioned the Chief Justice’s opinion in 2012 Judge Barrett wrote: “Chief Justice Roberts pushed the Affordable Care Act beyond its reasonable meaning to save the law.”
In an interview after the 2015 decision, she said, « I think the opposition has the best legal arguments. »
« This does not mean that the outcome is not favorable, » Judge Barrett said at the time that it was clearly a good result that these millions of Americans did not lose their tax benefits.
The new case, California v Texas, No 19-840, by Republican officials who said the mandate had become unconstitutional after Congress in 2017 abolished the penalty for failure to obtain health insurance because it could no longer be justified as a tax
They went on to say that delegation was a fundamental feature of the law, which means that every other part of it must be eliminated
The challenge largely succeeded in lower courts where a federal judge in Texas ruled that the entire law was invalid, but delayed the effect of his ruling until the case was appealed. In December, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in New Orleans, agreed that the mandate changed Constitutional, but refused to rule on the fate of the remainder of the health law, and asked the lower court to reconsider the question in more detail
Democratic countries and the House of Representatives, which has intervened in the case in defense of the health law, asked the Supreme Court to intervene, saying that a speedy decision is needed to remove the ambiguity caused by decisions of lower courts
Defenders of the law hope that the Republican contenders will not be able to run the table on three separate legal arguments they will need to win: that they have suffered the kind of damage that gives them the right to sue; That the abolition of the tax penalty rendered the individual mandate unconstitutional; And that what remains of the law cannot stand without individual authorization.
Republicans also face the challenge of the massive practical effects of repealing the law Doing so would raise the ranks of the uninsured in the United States by more than 20 million people – nearly a 70 percent increase – according to new estimates from the Urban Institute.
The biggest coverage loss would be among low-income adults who became Medicaid eligible under the law after all states expanded the program to include them, except for dozens of states but millions will also lose private insurance, including young adults who are allowed by law to remain in their parents’ plans until At the age of 26 and families whose income was modest enough to qualify for benefits under the law help pay their monthly payments
Tuesday’s pleadings, which will be heard by phone, are scheduled for 80 minutes but will likely last two hours or more Michael J. Monaghan, the California attorney general who represents the liberal-leaning states coalition, will defend the law Kyle D Hawkins, the Texas attorney general who represents the Conservative Leaning States coalition, will urge judges to drop her
Two other attorneys will also be attending: Jeffrey B Wall, Representing U o Attorney General, will debate the Trump administration in support of Texas and Donald B. Verrilli Jr, who successfully defended the law in 2012 as the attorney general in the Obama administration, will debate the House of Representatives in support of California
United States Supreme Court, Affordable Care Act, Act, Donald Trump, Healthcare
World News – United States – Supporting Key Judges’ references to Affordable Care Act
Donnez votre avis et abonnez-vous pour plus d’infos
Vidéo du jour: